the mx code is old and the version you mentiom even more. Mx will remain used in the forseeable future
regards martin
On 27 mei 2010, at 08:37, Alex Dubov oakad@yahoo.com wrote:
Greetings.
I understand, that this issue was probably discussed before, but I couldn't quite find a way to search the list archive.
It appears to me, that mx version 3, found on savannah.nongnu.org, is somewhat out of sync with the one used for monetdb (@mal and @include tags are not supported by it; adding the former was trivial, while I've set the later to no-op, as included *.mx files are nowhere to be found in the monetdb source tree). The mx doc formatter itself is also quite underdeveloped, compared to what we came to expect from systems like doxygen or sphinx.
In light of the above, I wonder, are there any plans to switch to a different code documentation system (doxygen?) or is the mx tool intended for future development?
Monetdb-developers mailing list Monetdb-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-developers