Re: [Monetdb-developers] Monetdb-developers Digest, Vol 5, Issue 6

-- | Dr. Stefan Manegold | mailto:Stefan.Manegold@cwi.nl | | CWI, P.O.Box 94079 | http://www.cwi.nl/~manegold/ | | 1090 GB Amsterdam | Tel.: +31 (20) 592-4212 | | The Netherlands | Fax : +31 (20) 592-4312 | ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 12:43:21 +0200 From: Stefan Manegold Stefan.Manegold@cwi.nl Subject: Re: [Monetdb-developers] The new "ws-API", Algebra & XRpc (& PFtijah) To: Monetdb-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: 20061006104321.GA2821@corona.ins.cwi.nl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 11:03:09AM +0200, Stefan Manegold wrote: > Dear Peter, dear fellow PF & MXQ developers, [...] > In cases of XRpc & Algebra, there are still places were wsid := ws_id(ws) is > IMHO called in the wrong location: > > XRpc: > In PROC rpc_client() (runtime/xrpc.mx), I had changed > ws_addcoll(ws, ... > to > ws_opencoll(ws_id(ws), ... > While this seems to worg for now with read-only documents (i.e., in the > absense of updates and concurrency), it is IMHO incorrect in general. > Rather, rpc_client should receive wsid as argument instead of ws; > if necessary, ws can then be derived via ws := ws_bat(wsid). I just changed the signatures of doLoopLiftedRPC() & rpc_client() to receive lng wsid instead of BAT ws, BAT ws is the locally derived via ws := ws_bat(wsid); All XRpc tests seem to work fine. Stefan [...] -- | Dr. Stefan Manegold | mailto:Stefan.Manegold@cwi.nl | | CWI, P.O.Box 94079 | http://www.cwi.nl/~manegold/ | | 1090 GB Amsterdam | Tel.: +31 (20) 592-4212 | | The Netherlands | Fax : +31 (20) 592-4312 | ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 14:39:19 +0200 From: Jan Rittinger rittinge@in.tum.de Subject: Re: [Monetdb-developers] The new "ws-API", Algebra & XRpc (& PFtijah) To: Monetdb-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: 45264E77.3060201@in.tum.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed If this wsid is a concept that is strictly necessary for the update support (and nobody except me thinks that this bit shifting might be not the nicest solution) we could also think about getting rid of the ws and replacing it with the wsid. I just do not like the fact that there are two variables underway that have some side effects on each other. So a fourth proposal (d) would be to replace the occurrences of ws by wsid. This would mean that *all* document accesses would have to include another indirection (even all path steps). On 10/05/2006 11:03 AM, Stefan Manegold wrote with possible deletions: > Dear Peter, dear fellow PF & MXQ developers, > > I'm not sure, whether I do understand the new "ws-API" correctly, and would > be grateful if someone of you could enlighten me. > > First, here's how far I get so far (please correct me if/where I'm wrong!), > followed by concrete open questions. > > For transaction support, Peter introduced a new wsid that uniquely > identifies (a reference to?) a ws, which is required for conflict detection > (as far as I understand). > > A wsid is to be generated from/for a ws by calling wsid := ws_id(ws); > however, this generated a new unique id each time is called (two calls on > the same ws yield two different ids, right?), hence, wsid := ws_id(ws) > should immediately follow ws := ws_create() . > > For the inverse, there is ws := ws_bat(wsid) that return the ws identified > by wsid; obviously, this function yield the same result each time it's > called with the same wsid. > > Since some functionality required to to the wsid instead of "only" the ws, > Peter had changes the signatures/API of some runtime PROCs. As far as I see > right now, these are mainly (only?) > ws_doc(ws, ... -> ws_opendoc(wsid, ... > ws_addcoll(ws, ... -> ws_opencoll(wsid, ... > ws_destroy(int(ws)) -> ws_destroy(wsid) > > I finished these changes by simply running the folloing one-liners: > > find * -type f | xargs grep -l 'var ws := ws_create();' | xargs perl -i -p -e 's|(var ws := ws_create();)|$1 var wsid := ws_id(ws);|' > find * -type f | xargs grep -l 'ws_doc(ws,' | xargs perl -i -p -e 's|ws_doc(ws,|ws_opendoc(wsid,|' > find * -type f | xargs grep -l 'ws_destroy(int(ws))' | xargs perl -i -p -e 's|ws_destroy(int(ws))|ws_destroy(wsid)|' > find * -type f | xargs grep -l 'ws_addcoll(ws,' | xargs perl -i -p -e 's|ws_addcoll(ws,|ws_opencoll(wsid,|' > find * -type f | xargs grep -l 'ws_addcoll' | xargs perl -i -p -e 's|ws_addcoll|ws_opencoll|' > > > While this seemed to have been enough to fix all .milS tests and (most of) > the milprint_summer functionallity, there are two open issues left: > the Algebra version, XRpc & PFtijah. > > To be honest, I haven't looked at PFtijah, yet; some help by the respective > experst would be appreciated. > > > In cases of XRpc & Algebra, there are still places were wsid := ws_id(ws) is > IMHO called in the wrong location: > > XRpc: > In PROC rpc_client() (runtime/xrpc.mx), I had changed > ws_addcoll(ws, ... > to > ws_opencoll(ws_id(ws), ... > While this seems to worg for now with read-only documents (i.e., in the > absense of updates and concurrency), it is IMHO incorrect in general. > Rather, rpc_client should receive wsid as argument instead of ws; > if necessary, ws can then be derived via ws := ws_bat(wsid). > > Algebra: > in PROC doc_tbl() (runtime/pf_support.mx), I had changed > var r := ws_doc(ws, item); > into > var wsid := ws_id(ws); > var r := ws_opendoc(wsid, item); > Same story as above. > However, doc_tbl return ws also in its result BAT-of-BATs, as far as I > understand mainly for "canonical API" reasons. > Obviously, it is not possible to replace BAT ws by lng wsid, here... > > > Leaving the latter problem aside for the moment, the following could (have) > work(ed) as a general rule, and we should check and change the codebase > accordingly: > > 1) wsid := ws_id(ws) must only be called immediately after ws := ws_create() > > 2) all functions/PROCs that recursively (i.e., including all transitively > called functions/PROCs) require wsid instead of or inaddition to ws should > be modified in that the receive wsid instead of ws as an argument; > ws can then locally be derived via ws := ws_bat(wsid) if/where necessary. > > 3) all functions/PROCs that recursively (i.e., including all transitively > called functions/PROCs) "never" (at least not yet) require wsid, but are > fine with ws can stay unchanged, i.e., getting (only) ws as argument. > Obviously, wherever these functions need to maintain a signature/API > aligned with those that fall under point 2) above, we should also change > these functions as described above with 2). > > > As indicated above, this does not work for doc_tbl and its companion PROCs > in runtime/pf_support.mx that make-up the interface between the Algebra > version of the compiler and the runtime. > I assume the respective canonical API could be changed in that the > respective PROC get wsid instead of (or in addition to?) ws as arguments. > However, we cannot easily change the API to return wsid (lng) instead of ws > (BAT) in the result BAT-of-BATs. Here, I see three solutions --- the last > one actually comes from JanR: > > a) Is ws/wsid indeed required in the result? > If not, we could simply discard it. > > b) Wrap wsid temprarly into a ("fake") [void,lng] BAT containing only one > (nil,wsid) BUN. > (Ugly!) > > c) (JanR) Put the wsid inside ws --- basically as a ("fake") BAT [void,lng]. > Kind of the "encapsulated" solution --- not only for the algebra-runtime > interface! > Consequently, we should have ws_create() call ws_id(ws) internally and > stored the result in ws (this could save the seemingly "redundant" > ws := ws_create(); wsid := ws_id(ws); sequence), and all (most, except at > least ws_destroy()) signatures/API could be kept / re-unified to pass > (only) ws (now including wsid) instead of wsid as argument. > > There seems to be one problem, so, if I understand Peter's comment > correctly: > " > - ws-IDs are now lng-s (combination of *unique* ID and bat-ID) such IDs > are meaningful also after the query is done (and ws-bat deallocated). > ^1^1^1^1^1^1^1^1^1^1^1^1^1^1 ^2^2^2^2^2^2^2^2^2^2^2 > this is needed for trans mgmt. > All meta-bats witha ws-id field now hold lng instead of int. > " > > In other words, (^2) wsid needs to be available also if ws is gone. > I'm not sure, though, whether is has to be available in the global wsid > variable (i.e., inside/during the query), or (only) in some meta-bats > outside (and hence after) the query (-context) (as suggested by ^1). > > > Peter, > > could you please enlighten me/us, here? > > > In case "only" (^1) is required, the "encapsulated" solution seems indeed > to be suitable for all code. > Otherwise, is would at least be a local solution for the algebra-runtime > interface (in case (a) & (b0 are no option), but bears the burden of > maintaining consistency between the global wsid variable and the wsid stored > inside the ws. > > > I hope, this email and any reactions to it help to clearify the current > situation, rather than to blur it even more ... > > Stefan > > -- Jan Rittinger Database Systems Technische Universit?t M?nchen (Germany) http://www-db.in.tum.de/~rittinge/ ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 15:08:00 +0200 From: Stefan Manegold Stefan.Manegold@cwi.nl Subject: Re: [Monetdb-developers] The new "ws-API", Algebra & XRpc (& PFtijah) To: Jan Rittinger rittinge@in.tum.de Cc: Monetdb-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: 20061006130800.GB5598@corona.ins.cwi.nl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 02:39:19PM +0200, Jan Rittinger wrote: > If this wsid is a concept that is strictly necessary for the update > support (and nobody except me thinks that this bit shifting might be not > the nicest solution) we could also think about getting rid of the ws and > replacing it with the wsid. I just do not like the fact that there are > two variables underway that have some side effects on each other. To be honest, I'm still in the process of analyzing trying to understand, what all the flavors, pros, cons, and ideas behind having/using wsid are; hence, I cannot tell, whether it is "strictly necessary" or not. As far as I understand so far, the basic idea behind the "bit shifting" is merely to store both the id of (and hence reference to) BAT ws as well as a unique identifier --- that is still valid after a query/transaction (and hence cannot simply be the ws BAT id, which might be re-used for a subsequent query/transaction) --- in one single atomic value. Further, I agree, that having two related variables that need to be kept in sync and treated accordingly is not very handy for maintenance --- my guess is, that the current situation resulted from lack of time and fear to implement (something like) your (d) proposal; which I agree is "nicer" & "cleaner", but requires quite a lot of possibly error-prone code changes --- nevertheless, I might give it a try during the weekend ... Stefan > So a fourth proposal (d) would be to replace the occurrences of ws by > wsid. This would mean that *all* document accesses would have to include > another indirection (even all path steps). -- | Dr. Stefan Manegold | mailto:Stefan.Manegold@cwi.nl | | CWI, P.O.Box 94079 | http://www.cwi.nl/~manegold/ | | 1090 GB Amsterdam | Tel.: +31 (20) 592-4212 | | The Netherlands | Fax : +31 (20) 592-4312 | ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 15:42:02 +0200 From: Stefan Manegold Stefan.Manegold@cwi.nl Subject: Re: [Monetdb-developers] The new "ws-API", Algebra & XRpc (& PFtijah) To: Monetdb-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Jan Rittinger rittinge@in.tum.de Message-ID: 20061006134202.GA6958@corona.ins.cwi.nl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 03:08:00PM +0200, Stefan Manegold wrote: > On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 02:39:19PM +0200, Jan Rittinger wrote: > > If this wsid is a concept that is strictly necessary for the update > > support (and nobody except me thinks that this bit shifting might be not > > the nicest solution) we could also think about getting rid of the ws and > > replacing it with the wsid. I just do not like the fact that there are > > two variables underway that have some side effects on each other. > > To be honest, I'm still in the process of analyzing trying to understand, > what all the flavors, pros, cons, and ideas behind having/using wsid are; > hence, I cannot tell, whether it is "strictly necessary" or not. > > As far as I understand so far, the basic idea behind the "bit shifting" is > merely to store both the id of (and hence reference to) BAT ws as well as a > unique identifier --- that is still valid after a query/transaction (and hence > cannot simply be the ws BAT id, which might be re-used for a subsequent > query/transaction) --- in one single atomic value. > > Further, I agree, that having two related variables that need to be kept in > sync and treated accordingly is not very handy for maintenance --- my guess > is, that the current situation resulted from lack of time and fear to > implement (something like) your (d) proposal; which I agree is "nicer" & > "cleaner", but requires quite a lot of possibly error-prone code changes --- > nevertheless, I might give it a try during the weekend ... > > Stefan > > > So a fourth proposal (d) would be to replace the occurrences of ws by > > wsid. This would mean that *all* document accesses would have to include > > another indirection (even all path steps). Well, I just realize that this actually only helps to save us from having function interfaces that expect/use either ws or wsid or both --- it does not help to get rid of the global ws variable: to exist throught the whole query, the ws BAT must either be a global variable or be persistent --- the latter is not possible, since ws is a BAT-of-BATs, and those cannot be persistent... ... I just recall, that we have something like "session" BATs --- I'll check whether that's an option (any help/hint is of course welcome ...) Stefan -- | Dr. Stefan Manegold | mailto:Stefan.Manegold@cwi.nl | | CWI, P.O.Box 94079 | http://www.cwi.nl/~manegold/ | | 1090 GB Amsterdam | Tel.: +31 (20) 592-4212 | | The Netherlands | Fax : +31 (20) 592-4312 | ------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=D... ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Monetdb-developers mailing list Monetdb-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-developers End of Monetdb-developers Digest, Vol 5, Issue 6 ************************************************