8 Dec
2005
8 Dec
'05
4:38 p.m.
On 12/8/05 5:31 PM, Jens Teubner wrote with possible deletions:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 05:09:14PM +0100, Joeri van Ruth wrote:
[...]
But then, I would prefer "byte" (gasp), "word" (shiver) and "long" (shock horror) over "bte", "wrd" and "long" anyway.
[...]
I second this. Is there some (technical) reason to use only three character identifiers instead of readable four character ones?
Yes, please use 'byt' and 'wrd': 'bte' triggers nothing but the 'bite' association, for me at least. And we're all bitten by MonetDB enough already, he he.
Cheers, --Teggy
--
| Prof. Dr. Torsten Grust grust@in.tum.de |
| http://www-db.in.tum.de/~grust/ |
| Database Systems - Technische Universität München (Germany) |