![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/4793806f3b6ea0a361d6cddd42d0d989.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
29 Apr
2011
29 Apr
'11
3:34 p.m.
On 29-04-2011 17:08:46 +0200, Stefan de Konink wrote:
Op 29-04-11 17:06, Fabian Groffen schreef:
Odd. That patch doesn't look too well. last_id is returned to the client as part of the request that caused the sequence id to be generated. That is safe.
What about implementing it as a client side variable that is replaced before sending out a query back to the server? You could do that for the rowcount as well.
I fail to see why one would want to make an extra query, while the information that query is supposed to retrieve is already available on the client.