Hi, The only comfort with lucene is the query syntax and the speed becuase of inverted index ( might be faster in BAT but have to wait to compare the performance). I will be happy to use it when it is available.
Thanks Bharani
Arjen P. de Vries wrote:
Hi,
We have this high on the wishlist, but had no time to do it yet.
The direction we expect to take is to make the underlying text indexing stuff from PF/Tijah accessible from SQL.
Notice that we are not so much interested in creating another coupled architecture, but rather plan to do all FT query processing in plain MonetDB code. (We have named this approach a multi-model dbms architecture in the past) So, no integration with Lucene nor Postgres's engine.
Many greetings,
Arjen
| Thanks for the link, i didnt know MonetDB had fts support. However i am | looking for the full text search capability in the SQL. Something like | | select * from table where column ='+include this text -but with out this' | so that we can combine the boolean text query along with the normal joins. | FastBit ( accorrding to the doc) has integrated this with MonetDB by | overriding the = operator. | | Thanks | Bharani
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Monetdb-developers mailing list Monetdb-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-developers