b and g must be aligned

Sjoerd Mullender sjoerd at acm.org
Fri Jul 26 12:34:53 CEST 2013


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2013-07-26 12:23, Miguel Ping wrote:
> On 07/25/2013 01:51 PM, Sjoerd Mullender wrote: On 2013-07-25
> 14:04, Miguel Ping wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> 
>>>> We're hitting this error "b and g must be aligned". I tracked
>>>> the src to a commit about some alignment code thing in
>>>> gdk_calc: 
>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/checkin-list@monetdb.org/msg09731.html
>>>>
>>>> 
(Fix alignment conversion in compatibility code for grouped
>>>> aggregates.)
>>>> 
>>>> Can you guys please explain what's the reason behind this
>>>> error? I can't understand by just looking to the src of
>>>> gdk_calc.c
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks!
> When using grouped aggregates, the grouping bat must be aligned
> with the value bat.  The value bat is b and contains the values you
> want to aggregate.  The group bat is g and contains for each value
> in b the group (an oid) it belongs to.  Equal group ids means the
> same group. These bats must be aligned, because we need to know for
> each value in b to which group it belongs. Aligned means: same
> length, and same head column values.  The head columns must be
> dense (a sequence of numbers starting at some value, and each next
> value exactly one larger than the previous).  Dense sequences are
> usually not stored explicitly in MonetDB.  We only store the first
> value in the hseqbase field.  So the hseqbase fields of b and g
> must be equal.  The one exception to this is when the bats are both
> empty.  This last exception is the change to gdk_calc.c in that 
> changeset.
> 
> -- Sjoerd Mullender
>> _______________________________________________ users-list
>> mailing list users-list at monetdb.org 
>> http://mail.monetdb.org/mailman/listinfo/users-list
>> 
>> 
> Thanks for  your explanation. I still don't understand how can
> there be a misalignment. I would expect MonetDB to feed my hll
> aggregate functions with the correct values. Can it be that I may
> have some NULL values and the validation is failing because of
> that?

If this happens when running a SQL query, it's a bug.
I don't think NULLs have anything to do with it.  NULL values are
stored in-line.
You might want to look at b->U->count, g->U->count, b->H->seq,
g->H->seq, b->H->dense, g->H->dense when the misalignment happens
(either in the debugger or by using printf--but realize that count and
seq are not int, so %d is not going to work).
Also things like the MAL plan (prepend SQL query with EXPLAIN) and the
stack trace might be useful.

- -- 
Sjoerd Mullender
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQCVAwUBUfJQyT7g04AjvIQpAQK/JAP9HCp/aFaYWv0jodfPUnSRVgFSsdjTn/VL
ttSsmAF+yomGMDIne2311f/D51F3/nte7Utx+01lgvArapWErhjGN1hzPSr5LQbs
PZ6dUfNcH8Rt2AtT3uSxfkFZy9VRDCNNXPei43IgMS2HxVZ48pnAVkNcpBbW3Gms
GwdvU7bSZtM=
=2zSg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the users-list mailing list