[MonetDB-users] [ADT] bug report?

Stefan Manegold Stefan.Manegold at cwi.nl
Mon Sep 1 21:50:04 CEST 2008


Dear Hendrike,

thank you very much for your detailed report.

I suppose you sucessfully compiled the latest released "Stable" "Aug2008"
version of the Super tarball, right?

Then, indeed the compilation problems seem to be triggered by the (our) code
in the latest "cutting-edge" "Current" development version from the CVS
heads.

Although we do quite some testing (cf.
http://monetdb.cwi.nl/Development/TestWeb/), we do not (yet?) have a
"Leopard" machine in our testing pool (we actually also lost access to the
"Tiger" machine we used to have...).

We will look into the problem ASAP and try to fix it.
Could you please also file your problem as bug report in the MonetDB bug
tracker at SF:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=482468&group_id=56967&func=browse
?

For the time being you might want to try the latest "Stable" version from
the CVS branches as listed at
http://monetdb.cwi.nl/projects/monetdb/Development/Releases/Version4.24/index.html
.

What puzzles me, though, is your initial point that no tests were included
in the tests were not included in the Super tarball. They should actaully be
in there. I'll check again ...

Stefan


On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 09:27:37PM +0200, Hendrike Peetz wrote:
> Dear people in charge,
>
> I have been spending a lot of time today trying to install Monet on  
> Leopard 10.5.4, 64 bit, core 2 duo.
>
> Before I did anything with the cvs, I tried to work with the Super  
> tarball version. Compiling was not a problem but the tests were not  
> installed and I was not too sure wether everything is working. I thus  
> wanted to install it properly:
>
> I checked out the latest version (friday I assume) from the cvs.
> bootstrap and configure worked fine, but I had problems with the  
> compiling.
>
> I tried gcc4.1 (apple) and gcc4.2 (apple) (Yes, I recompiled my c- 
> compiler!). Both of them returned the attached error.
> I am not sure wether this is my mistake or some weird code, but as I was 
> able to compile the tarball version I assume its something in the code.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Hendrike
>
>

> $ make
> make  all-recursive
> Making all in src
> make  all-recursive
> Making all in common
> make  all-am
> make[5]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
> Making all in gdk
> make  all-am
> /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../../MonetDB/src/gdk -I../../../MonetDB/src/gdk -I../common -I../../../MonetDB/src/gdk/../common   -DLIBGDK  -Wall -Wextra -std=c99 -g -Werror-implicit-function-declaration -Werror -Wpointer-arith -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wundef -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wno-uninitialized  -D_REENTRANT  -c -o libbat_la-gdk_system.lo `test -f 'gdk_system.c' || echo '../../../MonetDB/src/gdk/'`gdk_system.c
>  gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../../MonetDB/src/gdk -I../../../MonetDB/src/gdk -I../common -I../../../MonetDB/src/gdk/../common -DLIBGDK -Wall -Wextra -std=c99 -g -Werror-implicit-function-declaration -Werror -Wpointer-arith -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wundef -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wno-uninitialized -D_REENTRANT -c gdk_system.c  -fno-common -DPIC -o .libs/libbat_la-gdk_system.o
> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> ../../../MonetDB/src/gdk/gdk_system.mx: In function 'MT_check_nr_cores':
> ../../../MonetDB/src/gdk/gdk_system.mx:575: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code
> ../../../MonetDB/src/gdk/gdk_system.mx:576: error: implicit declaration of function 'sysctlbyname'
> make[5]: *** [libbat_la-gdk_system.lo] Error 1
> make[4]: *** [all] Error 2
> make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make: *** [all] Error 2

>
>
>
>


-- 
| Dr. Stefan Manegold | mailto:Stefan.Manegold at cwi.nl |
| CWI,  P.O.Box 94079 | http://www.cwi.nl/~manegold/  |
| 1090 GB Amsterdam   | Tel.: +31 (20) 592-4212       |
| The Netherlands     | Fax : +31 (20) 592-4312       |




More information about the users-list mailing list