[Monetdb-developers] mx tool status and future

Martin Kersten Martin.Kersten at cwi.nl
Tue Jun 1 10:18:40 CEST 2010


the mx code is old and the version you mentiom even more. Mx will  
remain used in the forseeable future

regards martin



On 27 mei 2010, at 08:37, Alex Dubov <oakad at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Greetings.
>
> I understand, that this issue was probably discussed before, but I  
> couldn't quite find a way to search the list archive.
>
> It appears to me, that mx version 3, found on savannah.nongnu.org,  
> is somewhat out of sync with the one used for monetdb (@mal and  
> @include tags are not supported by it; adding the former was  
> trivial, while I've set the later to no-op, as included *.mx files  
> are nowhere to be found in the monetdb source tree). The mx doc  
> formatter itself is also quite underdeveloped, compared to what we  
> came to expect from systems like doxygen or sphinx.
>
> In light of the above, I wonder, are there any plans to switch to a  
> different code documentation system (doxygen?) or is the mx tool  
> intended for future development?
>
>
>
>
>
> --- 
> --- 
> --- 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Monetdb-developers mailing list
> Monetdb-developers at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-developers




More information about the developers-list mailing list