[Monetdb-developers] Stable tree?

Stefan Manegold Stefan.Manegold at cwi.nl
Mon Dec 21 19:36:03 CET 2009


Hi Mark,

for all people that are not actively involved in core development of MonetDB
itself (involement includes both, developers themselves and "Guinea-pig"
users testing newly added yet "unstable" features), we always recommend to
use the latest stable release branch. At this moment, this is indeed the
Nov2009 branch.

Stefan

On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 01:11:08PM -0500, Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've been using CVS HEAD to test against, but now I'm wondering
> if I should switch the Nov2009 branch.
> 
> I'm going to use Monet DB in production for an in-house project,
> so I would prefer a reasonable level of stability.
> 
> Which source tree should I track?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> m
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
> Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
> A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
> Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 
> _______________________________________________
> Monetdb-developers mailing list
> Monetdb-developers at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-developers
> 
> 

-- 
| Dr. Stefan Manegold | mailto:Stefan.Manegold at cwi.nl |
| CWI,  P.O.Box 94079 | http://www.cwi.nl/~manegold/  |
| 1090 GB Amsterdam   | Tel.: +31 (20) 592-4212       |
| The Netherlands     | Fax : +31 (20) 592-4199       |




More information about the developers-list mailing list