[Monetdb-developers] [Monetdb-sql-checkins] sql/src/backends/monet4 sql_server.mx, , 1.169, 1.170
Fabian.Groffen at cwi.nl
Sat Jul 14 10:09:57 CEST 2007
On 14-07-2007 10:06:35 +0200, Niels Nes wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 10:03:32AM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > On 14-07-2007 09:43:49 +0200, Niels Nes wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 09:08:55AM +0200, Stefan Manegold wrote:
> > > > Ok, before we start changing these things back and forth:
> > > >
> > > > Anyone else who has an opinion on how M4 (server), M5 (server), SQL4, SQL5,
> > > > XQuery(4) should reveal their version numbers at startup-/module-loading
> > > > time, and whether the differences between M4 & M5 should/need to be
> > > > increased by having different/non-aligned/"inconsistend" welcome messages?
> > Face it. The architecture is inconsistent. In M4 your "on port "
> > message was sort of correct and useful, while on M5 this is
> > incorrect/irrelevant.
> Why ?
Because if you use auto-sensing, then the port may be something else.
Something that M5 + Sabaoth + Merovingian heavily depends on. That's
why Sabaoth now prints the connection that actually is used on M5 to do
the equivalence of Stefan's original "on port %d" message.
More information about the developers-list