[Monetdb-developers] [Fabian.Groffen at cwi.nl: Re: [Monetdb-checkins] clients/src/odbc/samples/Tests All, 1.1, NONE odbcsample1.SQL, 1.1, NONE odbcsample1.SQL.bat, 1.1, NONE?odbcsample1.stable.err, 1.1, NONE odbcsample1.stable.out, 1.1, NONE]

Stefan Manegold Stefan.Manegold at cwi.nl
Thu Jan 11 16:55:16 CET 2007


For the time being, I vote for reviving the odbc and java/jdbc tests in sql
(as I did and am doing).
A general re-organization of tests might be a good idea, but should be
planned carefully --- maybe only after the upcoming release...

Stefan

On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 04:19:46PM +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> This should have been sent to monetdb-developers immediately...
> 
> ----- Forwarded message from Fabian Groffen <Fabian.Groffen at cwi.nl> -----
> 
> From: Fabian Groffen <Fabian.Groffen at cwi.nl>
> To: monetdb-checkins at lists.sourceforge.net
> Reply-To: monetdb-developers at lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: * Re: [Monetdb-checkins] clients/src/odbc/samples/Tests All, 1.1,
> 	NONE odbcsample1.SQL, 1.1, NONE odbcsample1.SQL.bat, 1.1,
> 	NONE odbcsample1.stable.err, 1.1, NONE odbcsample1.stable.out,
> 	1.1, NONE
> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:18:26 +0100
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (Darwin 8.8.0, VIM - Vi IMproved 7.0)
> List-Id: "Checkin messages for MonetDB."
> 	<monetdb-checkins.lists.sourceforge.net>
> 
> On 11-01-2007 15:11:58 +0000, Stefan Manegold wrote:
> > Update of /cvsroot/monetdb/clients/src/odbc/samples/Tests
> > In directory sc8-pr-cvs7.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv12179
> > 
> > Removed Files:
> > 	All odbcsample1.SQL odbcsample1.SQL.bat odbcsample1.stable.err 
> > 	odbcsample1.stable.out 
> > Log Message:
> > 
> > ODBC tests can only be run once we have MonetDB[45] and sql;
> > hence, we remove tests from clients,
> > and revive them in sql/src/odbc/samples/Tests/
> 
> Since this seems to me like a problem for many (if not all), I'd like to
> have a (short) discussion on this first.
> 
> Possible other solutions:
> 1) create a "test" repo, which holds all tests, and make sure we have
>    structure that is able to track the proper dependencies for each
>    test.
> 2) move all tests to one of the repos where they could be executed (like
>    this commit suggests).  Problem is for tests that like to access more
>    languages, or backends.  Should they be in multiple places, or is
>    some half-.... dependency tracking necessary anyway?  Separates
>    source from tests as well as 1) but in a more fragmented way.
> 3) don't test.
> 4) only run testing after all components have been compiled.
> 5) ???
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Monetdb-checkins mailing list
> Monetdb-checkins at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-checkins
> 
> ----- End forwarded message -----
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Monetdb-developers mailing list
> Monetdb-developers at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-developers
> 
> 

-- 
| Dr. Stefan Manegold | mailto:Stefan.Manegold at cwi.nl |
| CWI,  P.O.Box 94079 | http://www.cwi.nl/~manegold/  |
| 1090 GB Amsterdam   | Tel.: +31 (20) 592-4212       |
| The Netherlands     | Fax : +31 (20) 592-4312       |




More information about the developers-list mailing list