Hi,

ok. The query is the following:

SELECT anon_1.sample_id AS anon_1_sample_id, anon_1.variant_id AS anon_1_variant_id, anon_1.qual AS anon_1_qual, anon_1.is_heterozygous AS anon_1_is_heterozygous, anon_1.read_depth AS anon_1_read_depth, anon_1.ref_depth AS anon_1_ref_depth, anon_1.alt_depth AS anon_1_alt_depth, anon_1.strand_bias AS anon_1_strand_bias, anon_1.qual_by_depth AS anon_1_qual_by_depth, anon_1.mapping_qual AS anon_1_mapping_qual, anon_1.haplotype_score AS anon_1_haplotype_score, anon_1.mapping_qual_bias AS anon_1_mapping_qual_bias, anon_1.read_pos_bias AS anon_1_read_pos_bias, annotations.variant_id AS annotations_variant_id, annotations.feature_id AS annotations_feature_id, annotations.ref_codon AS annotations_ref_codon, annotations.alt_codon AS annotations_alt_codon, annotations.ref_acid AS annotations_ref_acid, annotations.alt_acid AS annotations_alt_acid, annotations.type AS annotations_type, annotations.region AS annotations_region, annotations.splice_dist AS annotations_splice_dist FROM (SELECT calls.sample_id AS sample_id, calls.variant_id AS variant_id, calls.qual AS qual, calls.is_heterozygous AS is_heterozygous, calls.read_depth AS read_depth, calls.ref_depth AS ref_depth, calls.alt_depth AS alt_depth, calls.strand_bias AS strand_bias, calls.qual_by_depth AS qual_by_depth, calls.mapping_qual AS mapping_qual, calls.haplotype_score AS haplotype_score, calls.mapping_qual_bias AS mapping_qual_bias, calls.read_pos_bias AS read_pos_bias FROM calls JOIN samples ON samples.id = calls.sample_id JOIN patients ON patients.id = samples.patient_id JOIN diseases ON diseases.id = samples.disease_id LEFT OUTER JOIN (SELECT calls.sample_id AS sample_id, calls.variant_id AS variant_id, calls.qual AS qual, calls.is_heterozygous AS is_heterozygous, calls.read_depth AS read_depth, calls.ref_depth AS ref_depth, calls.alt_depth AS alt_depth, calls.strand_bias AS strand_bias, calls.qual_by_depth AS qual_by_depth, calls.mapping_qual AS mapping_qual, calls.haplotype_score AS haplotype_score, calls.mapping_qual_bias AS mapping_qual_bias, calls.read_pos_bias AS read_pos_bias FROM calls WHERE calls.qual > 0 AND calls.sample_id IN (227, 230, 233, 234, 237, 190, 195, 198, 199, 203, 270, 273, 276, 189, 343, 366, 367, 368)) AS anon_2 ON anon_2.variant_id = calls.variant_id LEFT OUTER JOIN known ON known.variant_id = calls.variant_id AND known.source_id IN (1, 2, 20, 19, 46) WHERE samples.accession IN ('17041R5', '20195R', '21984R', '23273R', '23390R', '13264R', '18337R', '18533R', '19811R', '20039R', '21776R', '21809R', '22927R', '17294R', '17071R', '21016R', 'Greif1R', '18337T', '18533T', '19811T', '20039T', '21809T', '22927T', '20195T', '21984T', '23273T', '23390T', '17041T', '17294T', '17071T', '21016T', '13264T', '21776T', 'Greif1T1S') AND calls.qual >= 50 AND anon_2.variant_id IS NULL AND (known.variant_id IS NULL OR known.clinical AND (NOT known.clinical_significance = 2) OR known.precious OR known.locus_specific_db)) AS anon_1 JOIN variants ON variants.id = anon_1.variant_id JOIN annotations ON variants.id = annotations.variant_id JOIN features ON features.id = annotations.feature_id JOIN transcripts ON transcripts.id = features.transcript_id JOIN genes ON genes.id = transcripts.gene_id WHERE (variants.is_transition IS NULL OR variants.is_transversion IS NULL OR (variants.is_transition OR variants.is_transversion) AND (anon_1.strand_bias IS NULL OR anon_1.strand_bias <= 60.0) AND (anon_1.qual_by_depth IS NULL OR anon_1.qual_by_depth >= 2.0) AND (anon_1.mapping_qual IS NULL OR anon_1.mapping_qual >= 40.0) AND (anon_1.haplotype_score IS NULL OR anon_1.haplotype_score <= 13.0) AND (anon_1.mapping_qual_bias IS NULL OR anon_1.mapping_qual_bias >= -12.5) AND (anon_1.read_pos_bias IS NULL OR anon_1.read_pos_bias >= -8.0) OR NOT (variants.is_transition OR variants.is_transversion) AND (anon_1.strand_bias IS NULL OR anon_1.strand_bias <= 200.0) AND (anon_1.qual_by_depth IS NULL OR anon_1.qual_by_depth >= 2.0) AND (anon_1.read_pos_bias IS NULL OR anon_1.read_pos_bias >= -20.0)) AND (abs(annotations.splice_dist) <= 10 OR annotations.region = 2 AND (NOT annotations.type = 2) OR annotations.region = 3 OR annotations.region = 1);

Kind regards, Martin

Am 22.07.2015 um 13:19 schrieb Stefan Manegold Stefan.Manegold@cwi.nl:

Hi,

We'd like to help, but to be able to do so, we'd (at least) need to know what query you're talking about ...

Best, Stefan

----- On Jul 22, 2015, at 1:09 PM, Martin Schwitalla MSchwitalla1@gmx.de wrote:

...

Hi,

I have a problem. I have tested on MonetDB 11.19.9 a query and wanted to test the same query on a better Workstation and installed MonetDB 11.19.15. But now I get every time the message „realtional query without result“ when I try to run the query. Can anybody help?

Kind regards, Martin _______________________________________________ users-list mailing list users-list@monetdb.org https://www.monetdb.org/mailman/listinfo/users-list

-- | Stefan.Manegold@CWI.nl | DB Architectures (DA) | | www.CWI.nl/~manegold/ | Science Park 123 (L321) | | +31 (0)20 592-4212 | 1098 XG Amsterdam (NL) | _______________________________________________ users-list mailing list users-list@monetdb.org https://www.monetdb.org/mailman/listinfo/users-list

Hi Stefan,

I can give you the create table statements. Is this sufficient enough for the schema? I can`t give you the data because it contains sensitive data with patients etc. But I don`t think that it is a problem with the data, because not even a EXPLAIN works on it.

Kind regards, Martin

Am 22.07.2015 um 14:09 schrieb Stefan Manegold Stefan.Manegold@cwi.nl:

Hi Martin,

thanks!

Which such a huge query, it's hard to make any statement by just looking at it. In other words, we'd need to be able to run and debug the query ourselves to be of any help. For that, we'd also need the definition (DDL) of the respective tables.

In general, with most if not any kind of problems, it's most efficient and effictive, if users can provide is with all ingedience (queries, schemas, data, etc.) required to reproduce (and thus be able to debug) the problem.

Thanks!

Stefan

----- On Jul 22, 2015, at 1:20 PM, Martin Schwitalla MSchwitalla1@gmx.de wrote:

...

Hi,

ok. The query is the following:

SELECT anon_1.sample_id AS anon_1_sample_id, anon_1.variant_id AS anon_1_variant_id, anon_1.qual AS anon_1_qual, anon_1.is_heterozygous AS anon_1_is_heterozygous, anon_1.read_depth AS anon_1_read_depth, anon_1.ref_depth AS anon_1_ref_depth, anon_1.alt_depth AS anon_1_alt_depth, anon_1.strand_bias AS anon_1_strand_bias, anon_1.qual_by_depth AS anon_1_qual_by_depth, anon_1.mapping_qual AS anon_1_mapping_qual, anon_1.haplotype_score AS anon_1_haplotype_score, anon_1.mapping_qual_bias AS anon_1_mapping_qual_bias, anon_1.read_pos_bias AS anon_1_read_pos_bias, annotations.variant_id AS annotations_variant_id, annotations.feature_id AS annotations_feature_id, annotations.ref_codon AS annotations_ref_codon, annotations.alt_codon AS annotations_alt_codon, annotations.ref_acid AS annotations_ref_acid, annotations.alt_acid AS annotations_alt_acid, annotations.type AS annotations_type, annotations.region AS annotations_region, annotations.splice_dist AS annotations_splice_dist FROM (SELECT calls.sample_id AS sample_id, calls.variant_id AS variant_id, calls.qual AS qual, calls.is_heterozygous AS is_heterozygous, calls.read_depth AS read_depth, calls.ref_depth AS ref_depth, calls.alt_depth AS alt_depth, calls.strand_bias AS strand_bias, calls.qual_by_depth AS qual_by_depth, calls.mapping_qual AS mapping_qual, calls.haplotype_score AS haplotype_score, calls.mapping_qual_bias AS mapping_qual_bias, calls.read_pos_bias AS read_pos_bias FROM calls JOIN samples ON samples.id = calls.sample_id JOIN patients ON patients.id = samples.patient_id JOIN diseases ON diseases.id = samples.disease_id LEFT OUTER JOIN (SELECT calls.sample_id AS sample_id, calls.variant_id AS variant_id, calls.qual AS qual, calls.is_heterozygous AS is_heterozygous, calls.read_depth AS read_depth, calls.ref_depth AS ref_depth, calls.alt_depth AS alt_depth, calls.strand_bias AS strand_bias, calls.qual_by_depth AS qual_by_depth, calls.mapping_qual AS mapping_qual, calls.haplotype_score AS haplotype_score, calls.mapping_qual_bias AS mapping_qual_bias, calls.read_pos_bias AS read_pos_bias FROM calls WHERE calls.qual > 0 AND calls.sample_id IN (227, 230, 233, 234, 237, 190, 195, 198, 199, 203, 270, 273, 276, 189, 343, 366, 367, 368)) AS anon_2 ON anon_2.variant_id = calls.variant_id LEFT OUTER JOIN known ON known.variant_id = calls.variant_id AND known.source_id IN (1, 2, 20, 19, 46) WHERE samples.accession IN ('17041R5', '20195R', '21984R', '23273R', '23390R', '13264R', '18337R', '18533R', '19811R', '20039R', '21776R', '21809R', '22927R', '17294R', '17071R', '21016R', 'Greif1R', '18337T', '18533T', '19811T', '20039T', '21809T', '22927T', '20195T', '21984T', '23273T', '23390T', '17041T', '17294T', '17071T', '21016T', '13264T', '21776T', 'Greif1T1S') AND calls.qual >= 50 AND anon_2.variant_id IS NULL AND (known.variant_id IS NULL OR known.clinical AND (NOT known.clinical_significance = 2) OR known.precious OR known.locus_specific_db)) AS anon_1 JOIN variants ON variants.id = anon_1.variant_id JOIN annotations ON variants.id = annotations.variant_id JOIN features ON features.id = annotations.feature_id JOIN transcripts ON transcripts.id = features.transcript_id JOIN genes ON genes.id = transcripts.gene_id WHERE (variants.is_transition IS NULL OR variants.is_transversion IS NULL OR (variants.is_transition OR variants.is_transversion) AND (anon_1.strand_bias IS NULL OR anon_1.strand_bias <= 60.0) AND (anon_1.qual_by_depth IS NULL OR anon_1.qual_by_depth >= 2.0) AND (anon_1.mapping_qual IS NULL OR anon_1.mapping_qual >= 40.0) AND (anon_1.haplotype_score IS NULL OR anon_1.haplotype_score <= 13.0) AND (anon_1.mapping_qual_bias IS NULL OR anon_1.mapping_qual_bias >= -12.5) AND (anon_1.read_pos_bias IS NULL OR anon_1.read_pos_bias >= -8.0) OR NOT (variants.is_transition OR variants.is_transversion) AND (anon_1.strand_bias IS NULL OR anon_1.strand_bias <= 200.0) AND (anon_1.qual_by_depth IS NULL OR anon_1.qual_by_depth >= 2.0) AND (anon_1.read_pos_bias IS NULL OR anon_1.read_pos_bias >= -20.0)) AND (abs(annotations.splice_dist) <= 10 OR annotations.region = 2 AND (NOT annotations.type = 2) OR annotations.region = 3 OR annotations.region = 1);

Kind regards, Martin

...

Am 22.07.2015 um 13:19 schrieb Stefan Manegold Stefan.Manegold@cwi.nl:

Hi,

We'd like to help, but to be able to do so, we'd (at least) need to know what query you're talking about ...

Best, Stefan

----- On Jul 22, 2015, at 1:09 PM, Martin Schwitalla MSchwitalla1@gmx.de wrote:

...

Hi,

I have a problem. I have tested on MonetDB 11.19.9 a query and wanted to test the same query on a better Workstation and installed MonetDB 11.19.15. But now I get every time the message „realtional query without result“ when I try to run the query. Can anybody help?

Kind regards, Martin _______________________________________________ users-list mailing list users-list@monetdb.org https://www.monetdb.org/mailman/listinfo/users-list

-- | Stefan.Manegold@CWI.nl | DB Architectures (DA) | | www.CWI.nl/~manegold/ | Science Park 123 (L321) | | +31 (0)20 592-4212 | 1098 XG Amsterdam (NL) | _______________________________________________ users-list mailing list users-list@monetdb.org https://www.monetdb.org/mailman/listinfo/users-list

---

users-list mailing list users-list@monetdb.org https://www.monetdb.org/mailman/listinfo/users-list

-- | Stefan.Manegold@CWI.nl | DB Architectures (DA) | | www.CWI.nl/~manegold/ | Science Park 123 (L321) | | +31 (0)20 592-4212 | 1098 XG Amsterdam (NL) | _______________________________________________ users-list mailing list users-list@monetdb.org https://www.monetdb.org/mailman/listinfo/users-list

Hi,

indeed ;-)

For all Oct2014 releases (including Oct2014-SP2 aka. 11.19.9) I get "relational query without result". In other words, other than you reported, also with 11.19.9 aka. Oct2014-SP2, your query does not work on your schema for me.

However, with the latest Jul2015 release candidate branch, I get SELECT: no such column 'samples.disease_id' and indeed, the "samples" table has no column "disease_id".

With the Jul2015 release due soon (though maybe not by the end of this month), and the problem seemingly fix / no longer occuring with Jul2015, we most probably will not further investigate, let alone fix the problem on the Oct2014 branch.

Best, Stefan

----- On Jul 22, 2015, at 2:27 PM, Martin Schwitalla MSchwitalla1@gmx.de wrote:

Hi,

that was it! One column had a false name in the create table statement and hadn`t been recognized in my query. But the error massage could be a little bit helpfuler ;) But thanks!

Kind regards, Martin

...

Am 22.07.2015 um 14:16 schrieb Radovan Bičiště radovan.biciste@ceosdata.com:

Hi, It is usually syntax error in the query like misnamed column etc. I would to try to comment out part of the query and see if syntax analyzer would give me better hint on what's wrong.

Radovan

On 07/22/2015 01:09 PM, Martin Schwitalla wrote:

...

Hi,

I have a problem. I have tested on MonetDB 11.19.9 a query and wanted to test the same query on a better Workstation and installed MonetDB 11.19.15. But now I get every time the message „realtional query without result“ when I try to run the query. Can anybody help?

Kind regards, Martin _______________________________________________ users-list mailing list users-list@monetdb.org https://www.monetdb.org/mailman/listinfo/users-list

--

---

users-list mailing list users-list@monetdb.org https://www.monetdb.org/mailman/listinfo/users-list

---

users-list mailing list users-list@monetdb.org https://www.monetdb.org/mailman/listinfo/users-list