Re: [Monetdb-developers] [Monetdb-pf-checkins] pathfinder/modules/pftijah/tjc tjc_main.c, , 1.11, 1.12 tjc_milprint.c, , 1.10, 1.11
On 2009-02-01 18:12, Henning Rode wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/monetdb/pathfinder/modules/pftijah/tjc In directory 23jxhf1.ch3.sourceforge.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21759/tjc
Modified Files: tjc_main.c tjc_milprint.c Log Message: propagated other retrieval models from old tijah implementation to the new one. (Sjoerd, should I check this in to the Feb2009 branch as well?)
If it works and you want it in the release, then yes.
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 06:28:32PM +0100, Sjoerd Mullender wrote:
On 2009-02-01 18:12, Henning Rode wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/monetdb/pathfinder/modules/pftijah/tjc In directory 23jxhf1.ch3.sourceforge.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21759/tjc
Modified Files: tjc_main.c tjc_milprint.c Log Message: propagated other retrieval models from old tijah implementation to the new one. (Sjoerd, should I check this in to the Feb2009 branch as well?)
If it works and you want it in the release, then yes.
^^^^^^^^^^^
apparently unfortunately not |-(
see nigtly testing resutl email, TestWeb, and/or simply
cd .../pathfinder && Mtest.py -r modules/pftijah
Stefan
-- Sjoerd Mullender
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Monetdb-pf-checkins mailing list Monetdb-pf-checkins@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-pf-checkins
Henning, JanF,
should we actually consider testing the new tjc PFtijah parser next to the (AFAIK still default) "old" one? If so, how?
Stefan
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 08:11:16AM +0100, Stefan Manegold wrote:
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 06:28:32PM +0100, Sjoerd Mullender wrote:
On 2009-02-01 18:12, Henning Rode wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/monetdb/pathfinder/modules/pftijah/tjc In directory 23jxhf1.ch3.sourceforge.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21759/tjc
Modified Files: tjc_main.c tjc_milprint.c Log Message: propagated other retrieval models from old tijah implementation to the new one. (Sjoerd, should I check this in to the Feb2009 branch as well?)
If it works and you want it in the release, then yes.
^^^^^^^^^^^
apparently unfortunately not |-(
see nigtly testing resutl email, TestWeb, and/or simply
cd .../pathfinder && Mtest.py -r modules/pftijah
Stefan
-- Sjoerd Mullender
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Monetdb-pf-checkins mailing list Monetdb-pf-checkins@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-pf-checkins
-- | Dr. Stefan Manegold | mailto:Stefan.Manegold@cwi.nl | | CWI, P.O.Box 94079 | http://www.cwi.nl/~manegold/ | | 1090 GB Amsterdam | Tel.: +31 (20) 592-4212 | | The Netherlands | Fax : +31 (20) 592-4312 |
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Monetdb-developers mailing list Monetdb-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-developers
Hej Stefan,
I think I will switch soon (one of the next days this week) to use the "new" version by default. then the test cases check my new code instead of the old one, which makes more sense, since i don't change anything in the "old" version anymore.
-henning
On 02.02.2009, at 08:47, Stefan Manegold wrote:
Henning, JanF,
should we actually consider testing the new tjc PFtijah parser next to the (AFAIK still default) "old" one? If so, how?
Stefan
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 08:11:16AM +0100, Stefan Manegold wrote:
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 06:28:32PM +0100, Sjoerd Mullender wrote:
On 2009-02-01 18:12, Henning Rode wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/monetdb/pathfinder/modules/pftijah/tjc In directory 23jxhf1.ch3.sourceforge.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21759/tjc
Modified Files: tjc_main.c tjc_milprint.c Log Message: propagated other retrieval models from old tijah implementation to the new one. (Sjoerd, should I check this in to the Feb2009 branch as well?)
If it works and you want it in the release, then yes.
^^^^^^^^^^^
apparently unfortunately not |-(
see nigtly testing resutl email, TestWeb, and/or simply
cd .../pathfinder && Mtest.py -r modules/pftijah
Stefan
-- Sjoerd Mullender
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Monetdb-pf-checkins mailing list Monetdb-pf-checkins@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-pf-checkins
-- | Dr. Stefan Manegold | mailto:Stefan.Manegold@cwi.nl | | CWI, P.O.Box 94079 | http://www.cwi.nl/~manegold/ | | 1090 GB Amsterdam | Tel.: +31 (20) 592-4212 | | The Netherlands | Fax : +31 (20) 592-4312 |
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Monetdb-developers mailing list Monetdb-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-developers
-- | Dr. Stefan Manegold | mailto:Stefan.Manegold@cwi.nl | | CWI, P.O.Box 94079 | http://www.cwi.nl/~manegold/ | | 1090 GB Amsterdam | Tel.: +31 (20) 592-4212 | | The Netherlands | Fax : +31 (20) 592-4312 |
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Monetdb-developers mailing list Monetdb-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-developers
participants (3)
-
Henning Rode -
Sjoerd Mullender -
Stefan Manegold