Martin Kersten wrote:

Romulo,

I checked in a small change to illustrate what could be done. For example, we could box the syntax to delineate it clearly from the comments. If necessary, we could also use a smaller font there, because the attention should be on the additional information.

Yes I agree. :)

I am looking for all the syntax needed and put it online. There few problems with the parser. Some of the options are optional and they should not be. There are no tests to cover all the options combinations which for sure will pop up some semantic errors in the implementation. Yesterday, I just found one in the first example.

In this way I can force Niels and also me to check all the parser (syntactically and semantically).

I will follow your structure for the next commits. ;)

Regards, Romulo