monetdbe, fetching date, daytime, timestamp in their MonetDB native memory storage format

26 Feb 2021


      Hello,
Since the first version of monetdblite (monetdbe now), passing/fetching the
date and time columns (in monetdbe or capi code for instance) is done using
intermediary structures, instead of native types (int, __int64).
typedef struct {
unsigned char day;
unsigned char month;
short year;
} monetdbe_data_date;
typedef struct {
unsigned int ms;
unsigned char seconds;
unsigned char minutes;
unsigned char hours;
} monetdbe_data_time;
typedef struct {
monetdbe_data_date date;
monetdbe_data_time time;
} monetdbe_data_timestamp;
typedef struct {
unsigned char day;
unsigned char month;
int year;
} cudf_data_date;
typedef struct {
unsigned int ms;
unsigned char seconds;
unsigned char minutes;
unsigned char hours;
} cudf_data_time;
typedef struct {
cudf_data_date date;
cudf_data_time time;
} cudf_data_timestamp;
I am wondering if this conversion is truly necessary, considering that this
effort is usually doubled by either converting back to native format (for
append operations, for instance) or extra conversion in other flavours of
date/time structures some other C code might need. The very few macros
required for time information extraction from the native types (is_nil,
extract) can be done on the client side when needed.
Related to this, a low level function "monetdbe_result_scan"  alternative
to "monetdbe_result_fetch" would avoid extra memory allocation in case no
storage is required or if a different storage for the result (user list,
compressed, straight on disk, ...) is considered by a developer. For
integers, doubles, float, date, daytime, timestamp types passing the data
address Tloc(b, 0) in the same way GENERATE_BAT_INPUT is doing it, looks
good enough, assuming the developer knows to use that memory address for
reading purposes. For the rest of the types (str, blob, others), invoking a
pointer to a provided user function (void *data, size_t data_size, size_t
j) inside the BATloop would suffice.
This "monetdbe_result_scan" part can be adjusted by a custom development,
sure, but passing date-time types columns in native format (which can come
from a remote connection as well) should be uniform. Having a version ID
for the monetdbe_result structure would also help in case a remote
connection can be instructed to provide results in different ways.
Dan

Daniel Zvinca

Ying Zhang

tags (0)

participants (2)